The Fish
for 20 July 2000. Updated every WEEKDAY.
Suck Staff
 
[Tim Cavanaugh]
Tim Cavanaugh
Special Guest Editor
 
Terry Colon
Terry Colon
Art Director
 
Heather Havrilesky
Heather Havrilesky
Senior Editor
 
[Phillip Bailey]
Phillip Bailey
Production Editor
 
Joey Anuff
Joey Anuff
Publisher







	
Suck Alumni
Suck Alumni Text
 
Hit & Run

While reading your piece on Tim
Noah and the Declaration of
Independence spam, I was sure I'd
see this link somewhere:

http://www.snopes.com/spoons/glurge/

Then again, not everyone is a fan
of snopes.com. Just thought I'd
pass it along.

Also, thanks for addressing what
would be the only possible outcome
for FM2030's thawed body. Unless
science finds a way to pull a
Lazarus, that pancreas will remain
stupid, dumb and wretched.

Alexia Henke
<alexia_henke@
exchangeny.deutschinc.com>

Thanks for your continuing support,
Alexia.

I have no feelings one way or
another about snopes.com, but I'm
not sure the Declaration Signers
spam qualifies as an "urban
legend." It's more in the way of a
heedless nationalist exaggeration.
For example, the spam says that
some signer was tortured to death.
New Jersey signer Richard
Stockton's health deteriorated
while he was in prison; he never
recovered, remaining an invalid
until his death a few years later.
It's reasonable to speculate that
his imprisonment was at the very
least not salutary. It may be a fib
to say that he was tortured to
death, but that's all it is —
not an urban legend on the order of
the peritoneal Barbie heads, the
sphinctral gerbil, the infested
beehive wig, or the microwaved prom
date.

Wishing you the very best,

tim
Fish With Letter Icon



It seems obvious from reading
Noah's columns that he was
referring to five signers being
captured and tortured before they
died as erroneous, not disputing
the fact that five signers were
captured during the war. That's
clear in the July 6 column; you're
basing your argument on the phrase
"the 'five were captured' factoid"
from the next column, which could
be interpreted either way and
definitely should be taken in
context to the previous article.
I'm not defending Tim Noah; I don't
even know who he is. I'm just
amazed that you'd use an obvious
editorial slip to attack someone
you clearly don't like, considering
the bungled apostrophe's later in
the column and the fact that Polly